Reimagining Open At The Crossroads - Make Claims


Sticker Open Science: just science done right by Melanie Imming and John Tennant CC BY

This third Reimagining Open at the Crossroads activity invites you to make claims about open education and about reimagined forms of open education. Everyone is welcome to participate in this activity whether you are attending the OEGlobal 2024 conference or not.

As with activities one (Reimagining Open Education At The Crossroad Through Music) and two (Reimagining Open Education At The Crossroad What If?), activity three builds on the work of Catherine Cronin and Laura Czerniewicz and their five part action framework for moving forward from a crossroads. For background context I invite you to read their essay and the Reimagining Open at the Crossroads Introduction.

In their essay The Future isn’t what it used to be: Open Education at a Crossroads Catherine Cronin and Laura Czerniewicz write, “Making legitimate and explicit claims to better futures is necessary, both to fuel resistance to dominant narratives and to inspire the production of new visions. Individually and collectively, we must make claims for open education that recognise, value, and serve all, particularly marginalised individuals and communities, and all those hurt by increasingly iniquitous systems and structures.

When we make claims about open education we often simplify our communication. One thing I frequently here is that, “Open education is about affordability and lowering the cost of education.” Which is true but this statement leaves out the main component of open education, its unique value add - “openness”.

This Make Claims activity invites you to make claims about open education that emphasize the “open” nature of open education.

It is this openness that connects open education to other open movements such as open access, open science, open source, open data, and open culture. Currently these different forms of open are largely siloed from each other. One way of breaking down the silos is by making claims that interconnect them based on their shared practice of openness.

So, in addition to making claims that emphasize the “open” nature of open education, you are invited to make claims that reimagine open education in ways that connect it with other open movements.

Feel free to make a claim based on some of the “What if?” scenarios from activity 2. Other claims about open education reimagined are welcome too.

To make a claim simply reply to this post and state your claim. Big, bold claims are welcome. Generate a phrase or sentence that conveys your claim in a memorable way. For example here are some recent claims from within and outside open education I’ve found memorable:

Earth is our only shareholder.” (Patagonia)
Open science: just science done right.” (Melanie Imming & Jon Tennant) “We are who we include.” (Norquest 2030)
Open is everyone’s business.” (OEGlobal 2024) :blush:

In the make bold claims spirit here are two open education claims from me:

The heart of education is open.

Open education is a public good for all.

Feel free to add explanatory comments for your claims and to reply to the claims of others with comments and feedback.

Now it’s your turn.
Click Reply and post your claim.

After the OEGlobal 2024 conference in Brisbane my partner and I did a little road trip out to the coast and south to Sydney. Along the way we stopped at Newcastle and while there came across Rising Tide preparations for a “Protestival”.

I’d never heard of a protestival before but it is a family friendly event combining music, dance, parades, speeches and protest. In this case the protest was about the failure of the Australian government to live up to Paris Climate Agreement commitments. It turns out Newcastle is one of the largest coal ports in the world and a significant aspect of the protest involved creation of a blockade flotilla made up of kayaks, dinghy’s canoes, rafts, and other boats of all kinds to block coal boats from coming in or leaving the port.

This video of the protest from last year gives a good sense of what the Rising Tides protestival is all about. The 2023 protest was deemed a success leading to a 2024 protest taking place the day we left Newcastle.

As I watched the preparations and the video from last year I was struck by the way organizers and protestors made claims. Claims supported by science. Claims supported by passionate beliefs. Claims that government inaction requires citizens to intervene.

Claims were made in speeches, on signs and in chants such as:

  • Civil resistance for climate defence
  • The tide is rising no more compromising
  • Stop the coal, block the ships, we say no apocalypse

Witnessing Rising Tide activism made we wonder if such activism might eventually be tried by open educators. Is it possible for the open education community to rise up in protest? Perhaps it is worth rallying around the right to quality education, a right already firmly rooted in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

We know education works to level inequalities, provides the means to escape poverty, and a better world for all. We know open education is the most powerful means available for fulfilling the promise of education as a universal human right. Open education is the most sustainable form of education investment that can be made. But we also know that educators, schools, institutions, and governments around the world have not taken action around open education.

I find it interesting to see the extent of climate action activism when there is so little open education activism. Perhaps open educators should rise up?