Apologies for the length of my reply, but I had already written these notes for a talk a few weeks ago, and am sharing a portion of them here since they feel relevant. I do eventually get around to answering Cathyâs question directly at the end.
Many open education advocates will tell you that the primary goal of open education is increasing access to educational opportunity. âEducational opportunityâ includes a lot of things, but for over 25 years the main focus of the open education community has been improving access to educational materials, which we now call âopen educational resources.â
Since the late 1990s, sharing openly licensed educational resources online has been our best strategy for increasing access to educational materials. This is true because once you create a digital resource - say, a PDF of an introductory psychology textbook - you can make an infinite number of perfect copies and send them around the world instantaneously and at almost no cost. This incredible new technological capability, which is so easy for us to take for granted today, completely changed what was possible in the late 1990s.
These new possibilities were immediately leveraged by Napster to make it possible to share music around the globe. However, as Napster and its users learned, sharing copyrighted materials without permission is illegal. So before we could fully leverage the possibilities of the internet to expand access to educational materials, we needed a way to legally share educational materials online. Open source-style licenses for content, eventually including the Creative Commons licenses, helped us make what was possible, legal - kickstarting the modern open education movement. And billions of people have accessed OER trillions of times in the more than 25 years since the first open content license appeared. Thatâs a lot of access to educational materials.
However, If your primary goal is increasing access to educational opportunity, creating and sharing traditional OER is probably no longer the best strategy for doing that. I said a moment ago that âeducational opportunityâ includes more than just materials. One of the other things you need is a person to talk to when the materials donât make sense. Weâve all had the experience of reading something we didnât understand, asking someone with more expertise to explain it to us, and finally âgetting it.â
Educational materials - whether a textbook, a video, or an H5P activity - are static representations of dynamic expertise. At some point in the past someone with expertise created that textbook, or video, or H5P, and then they hit âSaveâ and uploaded it. Their dynamic expertise is frozen in those static materials in the same way the vitality and power of a waterfall is frozen in a photograph.
Generative AI gives us access to dynamic expertise. Whereas a Pressbooks page might contain an explanation and two examples, generative AI can create an infinite number of explanations, with an accompanying infinite number of examples. If you donât understand the first explanation or donât relate to the first example, simply ask for another. A student stumped on a homework assignment at 1am three years ago had to wait to get their questions answered until people with the right expertise were awake and available. Generative AI can provide that expertise on demand, and of course generative AI is capable of much more than that.
In the 1990s, the combination of public access to the internet and open content licenses made it both possible and legal to provide access to educational materials to people in any place at any time. Today, public access to generative artificial intelligence makes it possible to access dynamic expertise from any place at any time. I think about the change catalyzed by generative AI this way:
The internet eliminated time and place as barriers to educational opportunity, and generative AI eliminates access to expertise as a barrier to educational opportunity.
At least, this is how my own teaching is changing. This past semester a sizable portion of the work I asked my students to do outside of class was something along the lines of âcopy and paste this prompt into your model of choice, and then share the transcript of your conversation with me.â They still did some reading and watched some videos, but they spent a good amount of time studying together with a generative AI model, and I anticipate my students will spend more and more time studying with these models into the future.
To answer Cathyâs question directly, âIf AI is poised to transform teaching and learning, how does this field stay grounded to its core principles?,â one answer might be to pause and consider when generative AI gives us more powerful tools for eliminating âunfreedom of educational opportunitiesâ than open educational resources do. It feels to me like generative AI is the better tool in several contexts already, and that the number of contexts it which it will be the more powerful tool for eliminating unfreedoms will grow over time. But for the foreseeable future, it feels like the âbestâ approach to eliminating unfreedoms will likely be a thoughtful integration of traditional OER and generative AI.